PROPERTY 2: Is smoking a risk factor for MI in the absence of the exposure, diabetes. So we look in the non- diabetics (

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

PROPERTY 2: Is smoking a risk factor for MI in the absence of the exposure, diabetes. So we look in the non- diabetics (

Post by answerhappygod »

Property 2 Is Smoking A Risk Factor For Mi In The Absence Of The Exposure Diabetes So We Look In The Non Diabetics 1
Property 2 Is Smoking A Risk Factor For Mi In The Absence Of The Exposure Diabetes So We Look In The Non Diabetics 1 (49.56 KiB) Viewed 53 times
PROPERTY 2: Is smoking a risk factor for MI in the absence of the exposure, diabetes. So we look in the non- diabetics (unexposed) and calculate an odds ratio. NON-DIABETICS (E-) Case (MI+, D+) Control (MI-, D- Smokers (C+) 500 155 1655 Non-smokers (C-) 990 1426 2416 Total 1490 1581 3071 e) Calculate the odds ratio? f) Is smoking a risk factor for disease in the absence of exposure? PROPERTY 3: We will assume that smoking is not on the causal pathway: it is unlikely that people start to smoke because they have been diagnosed with diabetes. g) Having checked the three properties, do you think we should adjust for smoking? h) What happens when we ignore confounding?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply