Respond to the student's post by either: (1) Discussing the psychological meaning of the findings of the table/figure OR

[correctanswer]

Respond to the student's post by either: (1) Discussing the psychological meaning of the findings of the table/figure OR (2) Discussing unexpected findings OR (3) Discussing general trends seen in the table.
Table 1 Intracluster correlation coefficients for the outcomes of interest, National Trauma Data Bank, 2001-2004 ED shock Male Female Early trauma death 0.015 (0.003 to 0.026) 0.013 (0.002 to 0.024) 0.012 (0.003 to 0.020) 0.033(0.000 to 0.09) 0.014 (0.004 to 0.024) 0.003 (0.000 to 0.007) 0.008 (0.000 to 0.016) 0.005 (0.004 to 0.009) 0.020 (0.000 to 0.051) 0.005 (0.000 to 0.010) Hospital fatality 0.022 (0.011 to 0.033) 0.018 (0.007 to 0.031) 0.019 (0.010 to 0.028) 0.068 (0.018 to 0.119) 0.023 (0.013 to 0.033) Blunt injuries Penetrating injuries" Total ED, emergency department. Values in parentheses are 95% Cl. "Based on the small number of subjects and clusters. Table 1 is a correlation table that is exploring the correlation between traumas with shock in an emergency, death after an hour at the hospital, and in hospital death rate. The major finding of the study was that there was less trauma suffered among individuals who were treated in a trauma center than those who were just treated in hospitals. The hospitality trauma was significantly higher that death after an hour at the hospital and trauma care patients. Reference Roudsari, B., Fowler, R., & Nathens, A. (2007). Intracluster correlation coefficient in multicenter childhood trauma studies. Injury Prevention, 13(5). 344. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.2007.015313