Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y. F₁ = 4 87 Difference in Magnitude 48" 4~1 Em in Angle F₂=5.5 11 Force Board Tri Calcu

Post by **answerhappygod** » Thu Jun 09, 2022 4:01 pm

: Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y F 4 87 Difference In Magnitude 48 4 1 Em In Angle F 5 5 11 Force Board Tri Calcu 1 (25.01 KiB) Viewed 389 times

: Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y F 4 87 Difference In Magnitude 48 4 1 Em In Angle F 5 5 11 Force Board Tri Calcu 2 (26.21 KiB) Viewed 389 times

: Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y F 4 87 Difference In Magnitude 48 4 1 Em In Angle F 5 5 11 Force Board Tri Calcu 3 (34.99 KiB) Viewed 389 times

: Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y F 4 87 Difference In Magnitude 48 4 1 Em In Angle F 5 5 11 Force Board Tri Calcu 4 (25.26 KiB) Viewed 389 times

: Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y F 4 87 Difference In Magnitude 48 4 1 Em In Angle F 5 5 11 Force Board Tri Calcu 5 (20.17 KiB) Viewed 389 times

Callaned Res 135 Meatured Equi Y. F₁ = 4 87 Difference in Magnitude 48" 4~1 Em in Angle F₂=5.5
11 Force Board Tri Calculated Resultant F₂=16N N=16N Measured Equilibrant K BOT 117 1031 = 117" 0₁₂2 Percent Difference in Mamitude RIZ F₁-15N 0₁R Percent Error in Angle 기네스노
Part 1: Force Board Trial 1 2 N 7.5 N 8N 013 15. PIR R 12 Data Sheet for Experiment M-2 012 N degrees 8 № 101* 89° Calculated Resultant R12 N 15- 30 15 % Dif in magn IR degrees 48⁰ 5-R12 Fy+ R12 Measured Equilibrant 0₁ N degrees 8N 117° (8N 13 5 % Error in Angle x 200% Percent Difference. in Magnitude % 16 Percent Error Angle % -0.55 180 11
Data Sheet for E % error in angle between F4 and R123:
10 Data Sheet for Experiment M-2 Questions 1. Has this experiment demonstrated that the vector resultant of forces predicts the combined effect of these forces? Explain. 2. In Part II, what factors could have resulted in the deviation of calculations from experimental values? 3. In Part II, could all four pulleys have been placed in a single quadrant and still be in equilibrium? In two adjacent quadrants? Explain.