G1 3 2 5 6 Student Name OR ID Number CLO K1.3 Criteria Project Idea 0.5 1 Poor topic and/or trivial Acceptable topic and

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

G1 3 2 5 6 Student Name OR ID Number CLO K1.3 Criteria Project Idea 0.5 1 Poor topic and/or trivial Acceptable topic and

Post by answerhappygod »

G1 3 2 5 6 Student Name Or Id Number Clo K1 3 Criteria Project Idea 0 5 1 Poor Topic And Or Trivial Acceptable Topic And 1
G1 3 2 5 6 Student Name Or Id Number Clo K1 3 Criteria Project Idea 0 5 1 Poor Topic And Or Trivial Acceptable Topic And 1 (91.13 KiB) Viewed 65 times
G1 3 2 5 6 Student Name OR ID Number CLO K1.3 Criteria Project Idea 0.5 1 Poor topic and/or trivial Acceptable topic and solutioh problem complexity None of these elements Only 1 clement are present in the code present in the code 1.5 Good topic and/or difficult to solve Only 2 elements present in the code 2 Exceptional topic of great importance Only 3 clements present in the code S2.1 C++ Code Contents The program must be complete, and these project- required clements must be used in the code: - Control Structures (if or switch) - Repetition Structures (For or While or Do While) arrays with one or two dimensions S2.2 Ability to run/debug: Free from syntax.logic, and runtime errors Unable to run program Able to run program Able to run program Able to run. Program but have.Logic error correctly. Without any correctly Without any logic error and logic error and display displayin appropriate appropriate output output V3.1 Teamwork Dysfunctional team: Members blamed cach other for problems in project: Team spirit completely lacking Team functioned at minimal level of effectiveness, Members concentrated on distinct parts of system without concern for impact on other members work Generally effective Very effective team: Team Members Team members not interested in presenting only worked as a a positive picture of cohesive unit during the team's work; design and Team members had a development of the broad idea of other system but also went members 'work on out of the way to project assign appropriate credit to each member for his ber Done thoughtfully, Very well organized good organization and logical report with Results mostly clear exceptional content and clear results Written Report(er) Confusing, unclear objective and/or results Somewhat organized; results need improvement
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply