- W 10 0 9 8 7 6 Tt 0 5 4 3 2 1 0 Lo Tt 100 Tt 200 2 Tt 300 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 Click To See Additional Instructions Refer To T 1 (184.36 KiB) Viewed 16 times
W 10₁ 0 9 8 7 6 TT-0 5 4 3 2 1 0 LO TT-100 TT-200 2 TT-300 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 Click to see additional instructions Refer to t
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899603
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
W 10₁ 0 9 8 7 6 TT-0 5 4 3 2 1 0 LO TT-100 TT-200 2 TT-300 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 Click to see additional instructions Refer to t
W 10₁ 0 9 8 7 6 TT-0 5 4 3 2 1 0 LO TT-100 TT-200 2 TT-300 0 1 3 4 5 6 7 Click to see additional instructions Refer to the above figure. If needed, graph values can be estimated to the nearest half-unit. Suppose workers have alternative employment available at wage $2. . The competitive wage is $ A. In this figure the firm's ideal wage is $ The lowest wage the union would accept is $ B. The monopoly union outcome is Wy=$ and Lu= C. Is the contract with w-$4 and L=8 a Pareto improvement over the monopoly union contract? (Enter "1" for yes, "-1" for no.) We can see from this figure that the contract with L= (Enter "1" for yes, "-1" for no.) outcome? DL 8 9 L 10 and the union's ideal wage is $ At this outcome the union's economic rent is $ . The highest wage the firm would agree to is $ and the wage bill is $ (Enter "1" for yes, "-1" for no.). Is the competitive outcome a Pareto improvement over the monopoly union contract? and w=$ is Pareto efficient. Is this contract a Pareto Improvement over the monopoly union