8. . Fe2 Excess Iron(III) was reduced to iron(II) by 0.344 g of chromium hydroxide according to the following unbalance

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

8. . Fe2 Excess Iron(III) was reduced to iron(II) by 0.344 g of chromium hydroxide according to the following unbalance

Post by answerhappygod »

8 Fe2 Excess Iron Iii Was Reduced To Iron Ii By 0 344 G Of Chromium Hydroxide According To The Following Unbalance 1
8 Fe2 Excess Iron Iii Was Reduced To Iron Ii By 0 344 G Of Chromium Hydroxide According To The Following Unbalance 1 (22.75 KiB) Viewed 8 times
8. . Fe2 Excess Iron(III) was reduced to iron(II) by 0.344 g of chromium hydroxide according to the following unbalance reaction: Cr(OH);" (aq) Fe(aq) (aq) + chromium oxide compound(aq) Fer from the above reaction was isolated and titrated with potassium sulfite. It took an average of 23.50 mL of 0.2557 MK250, to reach the endpoint. The titration reaction is. Fe? So, SO4 (ou . + (oul (0) - Fe3 (aq) Based on this information, what is the possible chromium oxide product? b. CrO2 C. Cr dcrog 2 a. Cro e. Cr2O74 f. Cr206
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply