Q.5 A continuous beam ABC of various flexural rigidities (EI) is subjected to external loads as shown in Figure Q.5. The

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Q.5 A continuous beam ABC of various flexural rigidities (EI) is subjected to external loads as shown in Figure Q.5. The

Post by answerhappygod »

Q 5 A Continuous Beam Abc Of Various Flexural Rigidities Ei Is Subjected To External Loads As Shown In Figure Q 5 The 1
Q 5 A Continuous Beam Abc Of Various Flexural Rigidities Ei Is Subjected To External Loads As Shown In Figure Q 5 The 1 (121.7 KiB) Viewed 43 times
Q.5 A continuous beam ABC of various flexural rigidities (EI) is subjected to external loads as shown in Figure Q.5. The beam has a fixed support at A and roller support at B and a pin support at C. A set of support reactions measured from the experiment is tabulated as below when using different set of point loads, PAB (kN) and PBC (kN). PAB (kN) PBC (kN) 20 40 60 80 100 20 40 60 80 100 Internal Moment measured at Supports A B с MA MBA MBC Mc (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) (kNm) -18.03 23.48 -24.33 -0.03 -33.96 51.05 -51.36 0.02 -54.17 77.04 -75.58 0.04 -68.03 102.91 -99.41 -0.01 -84.41 127.51 -124.98 0.01 Comment on the differences between the theoretical values obtained from structural analysis by Moment Distribution Method and the experimental values measured at the supports. Justify that the discrepancies between the theoretical and experimental values are acceptable. (25 marks) PKN PKN с 2EI CO ЗЕІ 4m 4m 4m 4m + Figure 0.5
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply