- A Television Manufacturer Claims That At Least 90 Of Its Tv Sets Will Not Need Service During The First 3 Years Of Op 1 (36.78 KiB) Viewed 148 times
A television manufacturer claims that (at least) 90% of its TV sets will not need service during the first 3 years of op
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899603
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am
A television manufacturer claims that (at least) 90% of its TV sets will not need service during the first 3 years of op
A television manufacturer claims that (at least) 90% of its TV sets will not need service during the first 3 years of operation. A consumer agency wishes to check this claim, so it obtains a random sample of n = 100 purchasers and asks each whether the set purchased needed repair during the first 3 years after purchase. Let p be the sample proportion of responses indicating no repair (so that no repair is identified with a success). Let p denote the actual proportion of successes for all sets made by this manufacturer The agency does not want to claim falsa advertising unless sample evidence strongly suggests that p < 0.9. The appropriate hypotheses are then Hopa obversus HP<0.9 (a) in the context of this problem, describe Type I and Type II errors. (Select all that apply) D A Type 1 error would be not obtaining convincing evidence that less than 90% of the TV sets need no repair when in fact less than 90% need no repair A Type 1 error would be obtaining convincing evidence that less than 90% of the TV sets need no repair when in fact (at least) 903 need no repair A Type It error would be obtaining convincing evidence that less than 90% of the TV sets need no repair when in fact (at least) 90% need no repair A Type 11 error would be not obtaining convincing evidence that less than 90% of the TV sets need no repair when in fact less than 90% need no repale. Discuss the possible consequences of each. (Select all that apply) The consumer agency might take action against the manufacturer when in fact the manufacturer is at fault. The consumer agency might take action against the manufacturer when in fact the manufacturer is not at fault The consumer agency would not take action against the manufacturer when in fact the manufacturer is making true claims about the reliability of the TV sets The consumer agency would not take action against the manufacturer when in fact the manufacturer is making untrue claims about the reliability of the TV sets, (b) Would you recommend a tout procedure that uses 0.10 or one that uses 0.017 Explain in the mature where the manufacturer is not at fault