Let S be a set well-ordered by ≤ . Let x ∈ S. Suppose x is not maximal in S; i.e., there exists an element z ∈ S with z

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Let S be a set well-ordered by ≤ . Let x ∈ S. Suppose x is not maximal in S; i.e., there exists an element z ∈ S with z

Post by answerhappygod »

Let S be a set well-ordered by ≤ . Let x ∈ S. Suppose x is not
maximal in S; i.e., there exists an element z ∈ S with z > x.
Prove that there then exists an element s(x) in S, called the
immediate successor, of x such that i) x < s(x) and ii) if x
< z then s(x) ≤ z, as well. Hint: Consider the complement of the
set s(x) ∪ {x} in S.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply