Does the location of your seat in a classroom play a role in attendance or grade? 300 students in a physics course were

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Does the location of your seat in a classroom play a role in attendance or grade? 300 students in a physics course were

Post by answerhappygod »

Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 1
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 1 (43.65 KiB) Viewed 30 times
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 2
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 2 (40.69 KiB) Viewed 30 times
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 3
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 3 (41.58 KiB) Viewed 30 times
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 4
Does The Location Of Your Seat In A Classroom Play A Role In Attendance Or Grade 300 Students In A Physics Course Were 4 (22.58 KiB) Viewed 30 times
Does the location of your seat in a classroom play a role in attendance or grade? 300 students in a physics course were randomly assigned to one of four groups. The 200 students in group 1 sat 0 to 4 meters from the front of the class, the 200 students in group 2 sat 4 to 65 meters from the front, the 200 students in group 3 sat 65 to 9 meters from the front, and the 200 students in group 4 sat 9 to 12 meters from the front Complete parts (a) through (c) Click the icon to view the chi-square table of critical values. 0.77 () For the first half of the semester, the attendance for the whole class averaged 76% So, if there is no effect due to seat location, we would expect 76% of students in each group to attend the data show the attendance history for each group How many students in each group attended, on average Is there a significant difference anong the groups in attendance pattema? Group 2340 Attendance 0.77 0.75 0.75 The number of students who attended in the first group was The number of students who attended in the second group was The number of students who attended in the third group was The number of students who attended in the fourth group was What are the hypotheses? Ho The average attendance in each groups the average attendance for the class Hy The average attendance in each groups the average attendance for the class What is the test statistic? x = (Round to the decimal places as needed) What is the range of P values of the test? The range of P values of the testis

Is there a significant difference among the groups in attendance patterns? Recall that a = 0.01 OA. Yes. Ho should be rejected because the value of the test is greater than a OB. No He should not be rejected because the P-value of the test is less than a OC. Na Ho should not be rejected because the P-value of the test is greater than a OD. Yes Ho should be rejected because the P-value of the test is less than a (b) For the second half of the semester, the groups were totated so that group 1 students moved to the back of class and group 4 students moved to the front. The same switch took place between groups 2 and 3. The attendance for the second half of the semester averaged 70%. The data show the attendance records for the original groups How many students in each group attended, on average? Is there a significant difference in attendance patterns? Use the value approach and use the level of significance 0.01 Group 1 2 3 Attendance 0.77 075069 059 The number of students who attended in the first group was 1 The number of students who attended in the second group was The number of students who attended in the third group was The number of students who attended in the fourth group was What is the test statistic? 73 (Round to these decimal places as needed)

What is the range of P-values of the test? The range of P values of the test is Is there a sigruficant difference in attendance patters? Recall that a= 0.01 O A. No, because the P-value of the test is less than the level of significance, OB. Yes, because the P-vatue of the test is less than the level of sigruficance. Of Yes, because the P-value of the test is greater than the level of significance OD. No, because the value of the test is greater than the level ot significance (c) At the end of the semester, the proportion of students in the top 20% of the class was determined. Of the students in group 1, 28% were in the top 20% of the students in group 2, 22% were in the top 20% of the students in group 3, 19% were in the top 20% of the students in group 4. 11% were in the top 20% How many students would we expect to be in the top 20% of the class il sent location plays no role in grades? The number of students expected to be in the top 20% of the class in group 1 it seat location plays no role ons grades is The number of students expected to be in the top 20% of the class in group 2 is The number of students expected to be in the top 20% of the class in group 3 8 The number of students expected to be in the top 20% of the class in group 4 is What is the full hypothesis HoThe number of students in the top 20% in each group be the same amongst the groups Hi The number of students in the top 20% in each group be the same amongst the groups

What is the test statistic? x = (Round to three decimal places as needed) What is the range of P-values of the test? The range of P-values of the test is Is there a significant difference in the number of students in the top 20% of the class by group? Recall that c = 0.01 OA. Yes. Hy should be rejected because the P-value of the test is greater than the level of significance OB, No Ho should not be rejected because the P-value of the test is less than the level of significance OC. No. Ho should not be rejected because the P-value of the test is greater than the level of significance. OD. Yes Hy should be rejected because the P value of the test is less than the level of significance
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply