(b) A researcher supects that the fish in a particular elevated wetland have elevated mercury level. To confirm that, fi

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

(b) A researcher supects that the fish in a particular elevated wetland have elevated mercury level. To confirm that, fi

Post by answerhappygod »

B A Researcher Supects That The Fish In A Particular Elevated Wetland Have Elevated Mercury Level To Confirm That Fi 1
B A Researcher Supects That The Fish In A Particular Elevated Wetland Have Elevated Mercury Level To Confirm That Fi 1 (30.91 KiB) Viewed 80 times
(b) A researcher supects that the fish in a particular elevated wetland have elevated mercury level. To confirm that, five striped bass in that wetland were caught and their tissues were tested for mercury. Then four striped bass in an unpolluted wetland were also caught and tested for the purpose of comparison Table Q1 shows the fish mercury levels in mg/kg. Table QI shows the fish mercury levels in mg/kg. Sample from polluted wetland Sample from unpolluted wetland 0.580 0.382 0.711 0.276 0.571 0.570 0.666 0.366 0.598 Construct the 95% confidence interval for the difference in the population means. Then, test at the 5% level of significance, whether the researcher's suspicion is valid. Assume that the population variances are equal.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply