After reading the final case study, "International Paper's Wildlife and Recreation Program," answer the questions at the

[answerhappygod]

After reading the final case study, "International Paper's
Wildlife and Recreation Program," answer the questions at the end
of the case study and upload the answers here.
1. How did IPís attitude towards recreation and wildlife
management change? What are the benefits of the new mindset?
2. What are the costs of the recreation program?
3. What obstacles existed to getting the recreation program off
the ground? How were these overcome?
4. Why have the costs from litter, arson, and other recreational
abuses declined over time for International Paper? Why did poaching
decrease on IP lands over the time period and why did IP cut back
on the legal hunting allowed?
5. What contributed to the success of the wildlife and
recreation program?
6. Why have nongame species population numbers improved?
7. How might IPís management style differ from the management
style of the Forest Service or the management of a state forest?
What might the environmental consequences of those differences be?
How might IPís recreation program be different if the timberlands
were located in the western United States rather than the
south?
8. What does the future hold for IPís recreational
opportunities? For its wildlife management program?
9. How would the task and cost of implementing these programs
have been different if the land holdings were not contiguous but
were fragmented?