Oliver v. the U.S. (1984) (a) A place of business that is not open to the public is protected, so why aren’t open fields

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Oliver v. the U.S. (1984) (a) A place of business that is not open to the public is protected, so why aren’t open fields

Post by answerhappygod »

Oliver v. the U.S. (1984)
(a) A place of business that is not open to the public is
protected, so why aren’t open fields, since neither of them is
mentioned in the Fourth Amendment?
(b) The Fourth Amendment protects reasonable
expectations of privacy even though such expectations are not
mentioned in the language of the Amendment. Even if we granted that
open fields are not protected, does not put up a “no trespassing”
sign create a reasonable expectation of privacy?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply