Page 1 of 1

Client1 has an IPsec VPN tunnel established to a Cisco ASA adaptive security appliance in Chicago. The remote access VPN

Posted: Sat Jul 23, 2022 7:11 pm
by answerhappygod
Client1 has an IPsec VPN tunnel established to a Cisco ASA adaptive security appliance in Chicago. The remote access VPN client wants to access www.cisco.com, but split tunneling is disabled. Which of these is the appropriate configuration on the Cisco ASA adaptive security appliance if the VPN client's public IP address is 209.165.201.10 and it is assigned a private address from 192.168.1.0/24?
Client1 Has An  1
Client1 Has An 1 (60.04 KiB) Viewed 59 times
A. same-security-traffic permit intra-interface ip local pool ippool 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254 global (outside) 1 209.165.200.230 nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
B. same-security-traffic permit intra-interface ip local pool ippool 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254 global (outside) 1 209.165.200.230 nat (outside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
C. same-security-traffic permit intra-interface ip local pool ippool 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254 global (inside) 1 209.165.200.230 nat (inside) 1 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
D. same-security-traffic permit intra-interface ip local pool ippool 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254 global (outside) 1 209.165.200.230 nat (outside) 1 209.165.201.10 255.255.255.255
E. same-security-traffic permit intra-interface ip local pool ippool 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254 global (outside) 1 209.165.200.230 nat (inside) 1 209.165.201.10 255.255.255.255
F. same-security-traffic permit intra-interface ip local pool ippool 192.168.1.1-192.168.1.254 global (inside) 1 209.165.200.230 nat (inside) 1 209.165.201.10 255.255.255.255