Answer Happy

Write Breifing note to INFLUENCE POLICY CHANGE for St. George Hospital, Cristchurch, NewZealand. Note should be of atleast 1000 words Describe the points in note given below ISSUE- BACKGROUND- CURRENT STATUS- EVIDENCE- OPTIONS- CONCLUSION- for more information on how to describe the points check the images below. Answer as soon as possible Thanks.

Briefing Note #: Insert briefing note number or other identifier. Issue: ☐ Explain in one or two lines why the briefing note matters to the reader. Sets out, in the form of a question or statement, what the rest of the note is about. Background: Gives a brief summary of the history of the topic and other background information and provides details the reader needs in order to understand what follows: • How a situation arose, • Previous decisions/problems, • Actions leading up to the current situation, Date: Current Status: What led up to this problem or issue? How has it evolved? Do not repeat information that you're including in the Current Status section. Describes only the current situation, who is involved, what is happening now, the current state of the matter, issue, situation, etc. □What are we currently doing on this topic?

The Evidence: Research evidence • Indicate results of literature search conducted based on 6-step pyramid in Levels & Sources of Public Health Evidence. See Evidence-Informed Decision Making (EIDM) Checklist → What do we know from the evidence? - What works to address the issue? What does not work? What factors are associated (e.g. barriers and facilitators)? What don't we know? □ Organizational evidence • Information about organization's 1 capacity to complete the task, e.g.. availability of Updated September 2021 Colloquial evidence • Environmental scan evidence (evidence from other health units) → What are other health units doing? Results of outcome and/or process evaluations Expertise, views and realities of stakeholders Partner or other in-kind resources Opportunities to draw from other areas of the organization ☐ Expert (practice/research) consultation evidence Political evidence • Public attitudes towards proposed policies, media reaction • Legislation or Ministry Guidelines • Community Values Human resources • Managerial expertise • Lobbyists and pressure groups Funds - reality of limited budgets Pragmatics and contingencies of Community evidence Habits and traditions situation

Options: Provide observations about the key considerations, what they mean, and a concise description of: . • The options; may include for example: maintaining current status: changing practice/policy: reorganizing human resources; training key personnel; submitting a funding proposal. • Their pros and cons Impact on organization Supports (or not) for strategic priorities or other organizational initiatives o Which ones? o How? Human resources o Numbers o Knowledge/ skills Budget implications Potential to impact other roles/teams/divisions o Which ones? o How? Potential or actual contentious issues Community o Preferences o Societal/population/community impact - Political issues • What will happen next? Conclusion and/or Recommended Response/Action: Conclusions summarize what you want your reader to infer from the briefing note. What's the take home message? 3 Updated September 2021 When identifying recommendations, offer the best and most sound advice you can offer. Make sure the recommendation is clear, direct and substantiated by the facts you have put forward Many readers jump immediately to this section, so be sure it covers the points you most want your reader to be clear about. Do not introduce any new information or evidence in the Conclusion section.