Problem 4: Recall that relation from a set X to itself is called an "equivalence relation" if it is reflexive, symmetric

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Problem 4: Recall that relation from a set X to itself is called an "equivalence relation" if it is reflexive, symmetric

Post by answerhappygod »

Problem 4 Recall That Relation From A Set X To Itself Is Called An Equivalence Relation If It Is Reflexive Symmetric 1
Problem 4 Recall That Relation From A Set X To Itself Is Called An Equivalence Relation If It Is Reflexive Symmetric 1 (33.81 KiB) Viewed 60 times
Problem 4: Recall that relation from a set X to itself is called an "equivalence relation" if it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive. A subset A of X is called an "equivalence class" of if for all a1,42 € A we have that a a2, but also that for all a € A and be (X\A), a and b are not equivalent. (a): Define a relation on the integers such that aRb when a - b is even. Prove that this is an equivalence relation. (b): Let A be any set and consider a function f from A to A. Define a relation such that a, Ra₂ when f(a) f(b). Prove that this is an equivalence relation. (c): What are the equivalence classes in the above examples? (d): Is the relation rRy when r-y<2 an equivalence relation? (e): Given an equivalence relation on X, can an element of X be a member of more than one equivalence class? (a): (You definitely don't have to do this one unless you find it fun) Define an equivalence relation on the real numbers such than a is equivalent to b exactly when their difference is a rational number. What is the cardinality of the set of equivalence classes this relation forms? (B): (You don't have to do this one either) Define a relation R on the set of functions from RR such that fRg when f(x) = g(r) at all but countably many values of r. Is this an equivalence relation?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply