Page 1 of 1

Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey HSD All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile = 2.667

Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2022 11:48 am
by answerhappygod
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 1
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 1 (43.47 KiB) Viewed 40 times
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 2
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 2 (32.27 KiB) Viewed 40 times
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 3
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 3 (27.6 KiB) Viewed 40 times
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 4
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 4 (26.93 KiB) Viewed 40 times
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 5
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey Hsd All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile 2 667 5 (30.8 KiB) Viewed 40 times
Effect Tests Source Panel Condition Panel Condition Panel A A 111223 Tukey HSD All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile = 2.66776, Adjusted DF = 12.0, Adjustment = Tukey 1 B ३ C C -Panel Difference Std Error t Ratio 3.12500 1.030776 3.03 -4.00 -4.12500 1.030776 -7.25000 1.030776 -7.03 Condition -Condition Difference 2 Nparm DF 2 2 3 6 Tukey HSD All Pairwise Comparisons Quantile = 2.9688, Adjusted DF = 12.0, Adjustment = Tukey A AWAWN 3 6 3 Sum of Squares 211.5833 1,230.6667 16.0833 4 3 F Ratio 24.8922 96.5229 0.6307 -7.3333 1.190238 -15.0000 1.190238 3.6667 1.190238 -7.6667 1.190238 11.0000 1.190238 18.6667 1.190238 Std Error t Ratio -6.16 -12.60 3.08 -6.44 9.24 15.68 Prob F <.0001 <.0001* 0.7039 Prob>It 0.0262" 0.0046 < .0001 Prob>|t| 0.0002" < .0001* 0.0412* 0.0002* < .0001* < .0001* Lower 95% Upper 95% 0.3751 5.87486 -6.8749 -1.37514 -9.9999 -4.50014 Lower 95% Upper 95% -10.8669 -18.5336 0.1331 -3.7997 -11.4664 7.2003 -11.2003 -4.1331 7.4664 14.5336 15.1331 22.2003
(a) Interpret the interaction plot in Figure 12.12. Then test for interaction with a = .05. Panel B requires less time F(int)= .0.6307, p-value= .0.7039; F = 24.8922, p-value = .0001; to stabilize the emergency condition. can (b) Test the significance of display panel effects with a = .05. reject reject H0, no interaction exists. HO
(c) Test the significance of emergency condition effects with a = 05. F=96 5229, p-value - 0001 do not reject НО (d) Make pairwise comparisons of display panels A. B. and C by using Tukey simultaneous 95 percent confidence intervals (Round your answers to 4 decimal places. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.) A-UB PA-μC B-uc HDD
(e) Make pairwise comparisons of emergency conditions 1, 2, 3, and 4 by using Tukey simultaneous 95 percent confidence intervals. (Round your answers to 4 decimal places. Negative amounts should be indicated by a minus sign.) μ1-42 p1-p3: p1-p4 p2-µ3: μ2-p4 μ3-4: (f) Which display panel minimizes the time required to stabilize an emergency condition? Does your answer depend on the emergency condition? Why? Panel B Yes minimizes the time required to stabilize an emergency condition, there is no interaction.
apter 12 Homework 1 Book rences Panot t Yes Savud Confidence interval minimizes the time required to stabiltze an emergency condition there is ho Interaction Help Save & Exi Chec (g) Calculate a 95 percent (individual) confidence interval for the mean time required to stabilize emergency condition 4 using display panel B. (Round your answers to 2 decimal places.)