Answer Happy

QUESTION 33 Is there a difference between urban and rural jurisdictions in the hiring of female police officers? In California, for urban jurisdictions (n=77) the mean percentage of female officers is 9.65 (SS= 1321.56). For non-urban jurisdictions (n = 84) there is a mean of 6.8 percentage of female officers (SS= 1436.37). Using alpha level of .01 in a two-tailed test, which is the most appropriate conclusion? O Accept the null hypothesis, there is no difference between urban and rural jurisdictions in percentage of female officers. O Accept the null hypothesis, there is a difference between urban and rural jurisdictions in percentage of female officers. O Reject the null hypothesis, there is no difference between urban and rural jurisdictions in percentage of female officers. O Reject the null hypothesis, there is a difference between urban and rural jurisdictions in percentage of female officers. QUESTION 34 Is there a difference between urban and rural jurisdictions in the hiring of female police officers? In California, for urban jurisdictions (n = 77) the mean percentage of female officers is 9.65 (SS= 1321.56). For non-urban jurisdictions (n = 84) there is a mean of 6.8 percentage of female officers (SS=1436.37). Assuming the null hypothesis was rejected, what would be the appropriate conclusion regarding effect size based on estimated d? O There is a small difference in urban and rural jurisdictions in the number of women officers hired O There is a moderate difference in urban and rural jurisdictions in the number of women officers hired O There is a large difference in urban and rural jurisdictions in the number of women officers hired 1 points 1 points Save Answer Save Answer