Why do scholars contend that the judiciary, rather than the collective United States Congress, is more likely to ``check
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2022 11:29 am
Why do scholars contend that the judiciary, rather than thecollective United States Congress, is more likely to ``check''unilateral presidential action?
A) Relative to the Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress is plaguedby much higher transaction costs in order to act
B) The U.S. Congress is more concerned with policy legacy thanthe judiciary, thus an unwillingness to act
C) The lack of congruence between constituent preferences andthe ideological positions of their legislators
D) The fact that the President is responsible of implementingcongressional statutes
E) The lack of professionalism (i.e., staff, budgets, membercapacity) found in the U.S. Congress compared to the judicialbranch
A) Relative to the Supreme Court, the U.S. Congress is plaguedby much higher transaction costs in order to act
B) The U.S. Congress is more concerned with policy legacy thanthe judiciary, thus an unwillingness to act
C) The lack of congruence between constituent preferences andthe ideological positions of their legislators
D) The fact that the President is responsible of implementingcongressional statutes
E) The lack of professionalism (i.e., staff, budgets, membercapacity) found in the U.S. Congress compared to the judicialbranch