Answer Happy

An article included a classification of 88 home runs hit at a baseball stadium according to the direction that the ball was hit, resulting in the accompanying data Right Center Right Center Field Left Field Left Center 17 Direction Number of Home Runs LAUSE SALT (a) Assume that it is reasonable to regard this sample of 88 home runs as representative of home runs hit at the baseball stadium, Carry out a hypothesis test to determine if there is convincing evidence that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. Calculate the test statistic. (Round your answer to two decimal places.) 10 7 17 37 MY NU Use technology to calculate the P-value. (Round your answer to four decimal places.) P-value= What can you conclude? O Fail to reject Ho. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. O Reject Ho. There is not enough evidence conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. O Reject Ho. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. O Fall to reject Ho. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. (b) Describe how the observed counts for the five directions differ from what would have been expected if the proportion of home runs is the same for all five directions. O For home runs going to left center and center field the observed counts are significantly lower than the numbers that would have been expected if the proportion of home runs hit was the same for all five directions, in addition for right field the observed count is also much lower than the number that would have been expected. Average: 275 Count: 21 Sum: 35 TOPN
What can you conclude? O Fail to reject Ho. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. O Reject Ho. There is not enough evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. Ⓒ Reject Ho. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. Fail to reject Ho. There is convincing evidence to conclude that the proportion of home runs hit is not the same for all five directions. Describe how the observed counts for the five directions differ from what would have been expected if the proportion of home runs is the same for all O For home runs going to left center and center field the observed counts are significantly lower than the numbers that would have been expected runs hit was the same for all five directions, in addition for right field the observed count is also much lower than the number that would have b O For home runs going to left center and center field the observed counts are significantly lower than the numbers that would have been expected runs hit was the same for all five directions, while for right field the observed count is much higher than the number that would have been expe O For home runs going to left center and center field the observed counts are significantly higher than the numbers that would have been expecte runs hit was the same for all five directions, in addition for right field the observed count is also much higher than the number that would have O For home runs going to left center and center field the observed counts are significantly higher than the numbers that would have been expecte runs hit was the same for all five directions, while for right field the observed count is much lower than the number that would have been expe 4.5. Pointsl DETAILS PREVIOUS ANSWERS PODSTAT6COREQ 12.XP.004.MI.S. MY NOTES