Page 1 of 1

pement 17 a try preve achte they was when (Assuming the differences are normally dabbed with no outlers, test reference

Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 12:11 pm
by answerhappygod
Pement 17 A Try Preve Achte They Was When Assuming The Differences Are Normally Dabbed With No Outlers Test Reference 1
Pement 17 A Try Preve Achte They Was When Assuming The Differences Are Normally Dabbed With No Outlers Test Reference 1 (25.59 KiB) Viewed 17 times
pement 17 a try preve achte they was when (Assuming the differences are normally dabbed with no outlers, test reference Find the heat state or the hypothe Hound to two decimal places as need Approximate the value for this hypotheen teat The values in the range State the concuon for this hypothesis st casions by aradi tehn h event OA Reject H₂ There is not aufficient evidence at the 0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than OB. Do not reject H There is sufficient evidence at the a-001 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0. OC. Reject H. There is sufficient evidence at the a-0.01 level of significance to conclude that the ofference is greater than 0 OD. Do not reject Hp. There is not sufficient evidence at the a 0.01 level of significance to conclude that the difference is greater than 0 (c) What do you think the results of this experiment imply about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior? OA. There is not sufficient evidence that babies have the ability to assess surprising behavior B. This experiment does not imply anything about babies' ability to assess surprising behavior because comelation does not imply causation (eபமாக