Answer Happy

Which of the following statements is FALSE? O a. The crumbling skull principle recognizes in some contexts due to the plaintiff's pre- existing condition, plaintiff's should not be entitled to damages for losses they would have suffered anyway. O b. According to the fourth element of negligence, remoteness of damages, the type of injury must be reasonably foreseeable. Oc. If you hit a pro tennis player who previously suffered an injury to their elbow and as a result, had a reduced career expectancy, but as a result of your hit was fully out of the game, you would be responsible for his full loss of income, regardless of the fact that he already had a reduced career expectancy. Od. The thin skull principle states that a defendant will be responsible for the full extent of damages suffered by a plaintiff even if the plaintiffs injures result in added costs for recovery. Oe. The 'but for test' is applied under the causation element and states that your loss or injury must be a direct cause of the defendant's careless conduct.
of Which of the following is NOT a possible defence to negligence? O a. Vicarious liability O b. Illegality O c. Waiver Od. Statute of Limitations O e. Voluntary Assumption of Risk Joint and several liability makes potential recovery of losses easier for the plaintiff. Select one: O True O False 4