Answer Happy

A local real estate investor in Orlando is considering three alternative investments: a motel, a restaurant, or a theater. Profits from the motel or restaurant will be affected by the availability of gasoline and the number of tourists; profits from the theater will be relatively stable under any conditions. The following payoff table shows the profit or loss that could result from each investment. Based on the Maximax criteria, the investor should choose Investment Motel Restaurant Theater Shortage $-8,000 2,000 6,000 Gasoline Availability Stable Supply $15,000 8,000 6,000 Surplus $20,000 6,000 5,000
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected payoff of choosing motel, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected payoff of choosing restaurant, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected payoff of choosing theater, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then based on the computations of the expected payoff of the three investment options, the investor should choose
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected opportunity loss of choosing motel, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected opportunity loss of choosing motel, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected opportunity loss of choosing restaurant, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then compute the expected opportunity loss of choosing theater, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
Question 17 For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, then based on the computations of the expected opportunity loss of the three investment options, the investor should choose O Motel only O Restaurant only O Theater only 1 pts O Either motel or restaurant
assume the probabilities for the gasoline- shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2, with the perfect information (i.e., knowing the gasoline availability information in advance), the expected payoff for the investor would be O $6,000 O $11,500 O $15,000 O $20,000
For the Orlando real estate investment problem, assume the probabilities for the gasoline shortage, stable supply and surplus are .5, .3 and .2. Then compute the expected value of perfect information, it is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign)
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 7. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) Investment B (-$50,000) 2 .30 .70 .15 55 .30 5 6 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) $80,000 7 40 .60 $45,000 20 .80 $60,000 .35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 8. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) Investment B (-$50,000) 2 3 .30 .70 .15 55 .30 5 S (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) 8 (-$9,000) 7 $80,000 40 .60 $45.000 20 .80 $60,000 35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 5. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) 1 Investment B (-$50,000) 2 .30 .70 .15 .55 .30 5 6 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) $80,000 7 40 .60 $45,000 20 80 $60,000 35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 9. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) 2 Investment B (-$50,000) 3 .30 .70 .15 55 .30 5 9 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) $80,000 7 40 .60 $45,000 20 .80 $60,000 35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 6. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) 2 Investment B (-$50,000) 3 .30 .70 .15 55 .30 5 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) $80,000 7 .40 .60 $45,000 20 .80 $60,000 35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 3. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) Investment B (-$50,000) N .30 .70 15 55 5 6 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) 100.000 40 .60 $45,000 20 .80 $60,000 .35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000 A E
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 3. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) 2 Investment B (-$50,000) 3 .30 .70 .15 55 .30 5 6 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) $80,000 7 8 40 .60 $45,000 20 .80 $60,000 .35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000
Based on the following sequential decision tree, compute the expected payoff of node 1. It is (type number only, no decimals, no dollar sign) Investment A (-$70,000) Investment B (-$50,000) 2 .30 .70 .15 .55 S 6 (-$20,000) $75,000 (-$17,000) (-$9,000) $80,000 7 40 .60 $45,000 20 .80 $60,000 35 .65 $55,000 $300,000 $60,000 $200,000 $70,000 $105,000 $40,000