3. [15 marks]: The Restricted 3-Body Problem, Part I. We all now know how to solve the 2- body problem by reducing it to

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899603
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

3. [15 marks]: The Restricted 3-Body Problem, Part I. We all now know how to solve the 2- body problem by reducing it to

Post by answerhappygod »

3 15 Marks The Restricted 3 Body Problem Part I We All Now Know How To Solve The 2 Body Problem By Reducing It To 1
3 15 Marks The Restricted 3 Body Problem Part I We All Now Know How To Solve The 2 Body Problem By Reducing It To 1 (282.92 KiB) Viewed 10 times
3. [15 marks]: The Restricted 3-Body Problem, Part I. We all now know how to solve the 2- body problem by reducing it to a 1-body problem. However, the same reduction cannot be profitably made for the general 3-body problem, i.e., three independent, gravitating masses. This results in a variety of interesting and unexpected behaviors as soon as more masses are included. We will begin setting this problem up here in the limit that the third body is a test particle, i.e., its mass is insufficient to influence the motion of the other two; this is called the "restricted 3-body problem". We will further simplify this by assuming the two primary masses are in a circular orbit. The two primary masses are M₁ and M₂, their semi-major axis is a, and the magnitude of their orbital angular frequency is = √G(M₁ + M₂)/a³. You may assume that all of the dynamics takes place in the same plane. a. (3 marks) To begin, write down the general 3-body Lagrangian and make the conversion to the center-of-mass frame for M₁ and M₂. That is, express the Lagrangian in terms of the position of the center of mass (R), the separation between M₁ and M₂ (7), and the relative position of the third mass, m, (7 – 73 – R). b. (3 marks) Now insert the solutions for the first two masses, i.e., R and 7 – a cos(Nt)à - a sin(t) j where we have chosen the and y axes to be aligned with the orbit initially. Show that the resulting Lagrangian is equivalent to 5² - constant GMAR 72 7 where = M₂/M₁M₂) and 72M₁7/(M, - M₂).
the position of the center of mass (R), the separation between M₁ and M₂ (F), and the relative position of the third mass, m, (ỹ = 7³ – R). b. (3 marks) Now insert the solutions for the first two masses, i.e., R = constant Fa cos(nt) + asin(t)ý, where we have chosen the 2 and ŷ axes to be aligned with the orbit initially. Show that the resulting Lagrangian is equivalent to and 1 L = -m|y² + 2 L= ST + mi (822 xã) tam X + GM₂m GM₂m GM₂m F1-9 F2-y where = M₂/(M₂+ M₂) and 2-M₁/(M₁ + M₂). c. (3 marks) This is more conveniently expressed in the rotating frame in which M, and M₂ lie fixed along the z-axis. Show that the resulting Lagrangian is equivalent to V(7) = — -m£?²³|71|² E VaM2/(M+M2) M + + GM₂m 2 [aM₁/(M₁ + M₂)→+ v²]² + v,² where the position of m is '. d. (3 marks) Write down the conserved energy and show that the potential experienced in the rotating frame by m is (defined as E-m7²/2) GMm ✓/\aM₂/(Mx + M₂) – 9;]² +4² " \aM₁/(M₂ + M₂) + %,]² + 7,² e. (3 marks) There are 5 "Lagrange" points, points in y' for which VI´ – 0. Make a contour plot of V(7) assuming M₁ - 2M₂ and visually identify these five points. Ostensibly, each of these points are equilibrium points. In Part II we will look at which are stable.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply