Answer Happy

16 of 34 PC randomly wet 8PCCs allocated DCM intervention RPCC allocated to enhanced care as usual Stage 1: 228 screened with PHOS 173 Stage 1 2759 screened with PHO 256 had to score=10 Stage 2: 249 minciund 24usion criteria Stage 2: 226 met inclusion and con criteria participation Gined participati 164 in clinic signed to DCM 162 in clinic signed to enhanced cars Usual 164 participants at baseline 162 participants at baseline 30 dropouts 17 dropouts month follow up 134 in analysis month follow up 145 in analysis 12 dropouts 28 dropouts 6 month follow-up 122analysis 6 month follow-up 117 in analysis & dropouts 8 dragen 9 month foow-up 114 in analysis 9 month follow-up 109 in analysis 4 dropouts 4 - 5 duopouts 12 month follow-up 110 in analysis 12 month follow-up 104 in analysis You are a researcher who is trying to see if including a social worker case manager would help prevent hospitalizations for depression. You randomly assigned patients with depression to the treatment group or to the control group. The control group received the usual care. Usual care for depression is a prescription for Prozac. The treatment group received a prescription for Prozac in addition to a biweekly call from their social worker case manager. At three months, 5 patients in the treatment group was hospitalized for depression. At six months, 6 patients in the control group was hospitalized for depression. This module activity is worth a total of 15 points. It is completely online. At the three-month follow-up, there were 10 participants 1) Calculate the Incidence risk difference between the treatment and control group using ITT. 2) Calculate the Incidence risk difference between the treatment and control group using per-protocol. 3) Describe what type of bias comparing the results from ITT and per-protocol would help us to identify. 4) Please explain whether you think the lack of blinding in this HPSR RCT lead to any bias based your calculations from Questions 1 and 2. Answer in 1-2 sentences.