We discussed in the lecture about a study in Sydney that finds that a 1% increase in humidity is associated with a 7.7%

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899559
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

We discussed in the lecture about a study in Sydney that finds that a 1% increase in humidity is associated with a 7.7%

Post by answerhappygod »

We discussed in the lecture about a study in Sydney that finds
that a 1% increase in humidity is associated with a 7.7% increase
in COVID-19 infections. Let's assume this finding is based on a
single linear regression. Suppose more humid suburbs are close to
the sea (e.g., Bondi) and are more crowded. Also, suppose
crowdedness can cause an increase in COVID-19 infections. Which of
the following is correct?
There is no omitted variable bias.
We can interpret the result from the study as a causal effect of
humidity on infections.
The study tends to overestimate the causal effect of humidity on
infections
The study tends to underestimate the causal effect of humidity
on infections
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply