Group Statistics Condition (1 = Unattractive, 2 = Attractive) N Unattractive photo Attractive photo 37 Mean 4.66 Std. De
Posted: Sun Sep 05, 2021 5:09 pm
- Group Statistics Condition 1 Unattractive 2 Attractive N Unattractive Photo Attractive Photo 37 Mean 4 66 Std De 1 (33.61 KiB) Viewed 117 times
Unattractive and Attractive conditions. Make sure to round to two
decimal places
A. The Unattractive condition has a mean of 4.22 and a standard
deviation of 0.79 while the Attractive condition has a mean of 4.66
and standard deviation of 0.71.
B. The Unattractive condition has a mean of 4.22 and a standard
deviation of 0.71 while the Attractive condition has a mean of 4.66
and standard deviation of 0.79.
C. The Unattractive condition has a mean of 4.66 and a standard
deviation of 0.79 while the Attractive condition has a mean of 4.22
and standard deviation of 0.71.
D. The Unattractive condition has a mean of 4.66 and a standard
deviation of 0.71 while the Attractive condition has a mean of 4.22
and standard deviation of 0.79.
E. The Unattractive condition has a mean of 38 and a standard
deviation of 4.66 while the Attractive condition has a mean of 37
and standard deviation of 4.22.
4). Is the t-Test significant, and how would you write that out
in APA format?
A. Yes, the t-Test is significant, t(71.76) = 2.56, p <
.01
B. Yes, the t-Test is significant, t(73) = 2.56, p < .05
C. Yes, the t-Test is significant, t(73) = 2.56, p < .01
D. No, the t-Test is not significant, t(73) = 2.56, p >
.05
E. No, the t-Test is not significant, t(71.76) = 2.56, p >
.05
5). Finally, which of the following are the correct results as
you would write them in an APA formatted results section.
A. We ran an independent samples t-Test with cell phone opinion
(Against versus In favor) as our independent variable and ratings
of photo attractiveness as our dependent variable. The t-Test was
not significant, t(73) = 2.56, p > .05. Participants rated the
essay author as more attractive in the “against” condition (M =
4.66, SD = 0.71) than in the “in favor” condition (M = 4.22, SD =
0.79). This fails to support the idea that participants are
persuaded by cell phone opinions.
B. We ran an independent samples t-Test with photo condition
(Attractive versus Unattractive) as our independent variable and
ratings of “What is your opinion about children owning a cell
phone?” our dependent variable. The t-Test was not significant,
t(73) = 2.56, p > .05. Participants were equally in favor of
children having cell phones regardless of whether the author was
attractive (M = 4.22, SD = 0.79) or unattractive (M= 4.66, SD =
0.71). This fails to support the idea that participants are
persuaded by the attractiveness of an essay writer.
C. We ran an independent samples t-Test with photo condition
(Attractive versus Unattractive) as our independent variable and
ratings of “What is your opinion about children owning a cell
phone?” our dependent variable. The t-Test was significant, t(73) =
2.56, p < .05. Participants were more against cell phones for
children if the author suggesting this proposal was attractive (M =
4.22, SD = 0.79) than if she was unattractive (M = 4.66, SD =
0.71). This supports the idea that participants are persuaded by an
attractive essay writer.
D. We ran an independent samples t-Test with photo condition
(Attractive versus Unattractive) as our independent variable and
ratings of “What is your opinion about children owning a cell
phone?” our dependent variable. The t-Test was significant,
t(71.76) = 2.56, p < .05. Participants were more against cell
phones for children if the author suggesting this proposal was
attractive (M = 4.22, SD = 0.79) than if she was unattractive (M =
4.66, SD = 0.71). This supports the idea that participants are
persuaded by an attractive essay writer.
E. We ran an independent samples t-Test with photo condition
(Attractive versus Unattractive) as our independent variable and
ratings of “What is your opinion about children owning a cell
phone?” our dependent variable. The t-Test was significant, t(73) =
2.56, p < .01. Participants were more against cell phones for
children if the author suggesting this proposal was attractive (M =
4.22, SD = 0.79) than if she was unattractive (M = 4.66, SD =
0.71). This supports the idea that participants are persuaded by an
attractive essay writer.
Group Statistics Condition (1 = Unattractive, 2 = Attractive) N Unattractive photo Attractive photo 37 Mean 4.66 Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean .708 .115 38 What is your opinion about children owning a cell phone? 4.22 .787 .129 Independent Samples Test Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means ד sig df Sig (2-tailed) .013 .198 .657 2.557 73 What is your opinion about children owning a cell phone? Equal variances assumed Equal variances not assumed 2.554 71.759 .013