Answer Happy

that is all the information given
View SLIDE 1 on the POF file. The following information comes from a reference examining Pp in Hawaring an elevational gradient (Raich et al. 1997 e 1 is background information for you, showing the rainfall and the temperature at the five study sites. At each of these sites they measured aboveground net primary productivity (APP) and the uptake of N and by the plants growing there (6) Reference: Raich, W.A. Russell, and P.M. Vrousek 1997. Primary productivity and ecosystem development along an elevational gradient on Maut tou, Hawar Ecology ?*: 700.721. Based on these data, explain the following a. The patterns of decreasing ANPP. N uptake, and Puptake with increasing elevation (op panel of Fg 6. Explain the reasons why these patterns might cost b. in the bottom panel of Fig 6 you can see that the young lava flow at each elevation has lower NPP. N uptake and Puptake than the old tava flow. The young lova flow is approximately 120 years old and the old lava flow is approximately 3400 years old. Explain the reasons why these patterns might exist

6000 600 ANA IN Upon Pupa 20 21 5000 450 4000 300 15 3000 150 0 200 1860 700 1130 Elevation (m) 2000 450 800 1350 1800 Elevation (m) The Average omatic characteristics of wind ward Me Les Hall Almeras (O) 2 y of consumes by Juvik and Nullet (1994 Rain Elang- wena reported by Juvik and Natu). Data for 2-a elevation are from weather station number 8.1, courtesy of the Com Water Rescue Me Department of Land and Natural Reme. Se of Hawaii USA 1000 000 600 400 200 Young Old Young Old 700 700 1650 1980 Elevation on Pio. To herdsel primer productivity (ANPR. Napake, Peter veger Top) younges for kids paired young and