the Amax (nm) Name of Ligand (0.1661 M) Color of Solution Energy difference (1/photon) 3.15 x 10-19 Energy Difference (k
Posted: Tue May 17, 2022 10:15 am
please help me with the discussion of the above results.
The lab report required us to analyze Tetraamminecopper(II) sulfate monohydrate and compare it to the other copper complexes made using the above ligands.
Rank the ligands from strong field ligand to weakest ligand field.
the Amax (nm) Name of Ligand (0.1661 M) Color of Solution Energy difference (1/photon) 3.15 x 10-19 Energy Difference (kJ/mole) 3.60 x 10-22 Deep blue 630 nm Purple 546 nm 3.64 x 10-19 3.64 x 10-22 5ml diethylenetriamine 5ml ethylenediamine 5 ml EDTA 5ml sodium salicylate Blank ( CuSO4) Sky Blue 697 nm 401 nm 2.85 x 10-19 4.95 x 10-19 2.85 x 10-22 4.95 x 10-22 Lime Dark blue 611 nm 3.25 x 10-19 3.25 x 10-22
The lab report required us to analyze Tetraamminecopper(II) sulfate monohydrate and compare it to the other copper complexes made using the above ligands.
Rank the ligands from strong field ligand to weakest ligand field.
the Amax (nm) Name of Ligand (0.1661 M) Color of Solution Energy difference (1/photon) 3.15 x 10-19 Energy Difference (kJ/mole) 3.60 x 10-22 Deep blue 630 nm Purple 546 nm 3.64 x 10-19 3.64 x 10-22 5ml diethylenetriamine 5ml ethylenediamine 5 ml EDTA 5ml sodium salicylate Blank ( CuSO4) Sky Blue 697 nm 401 nm 2.85 x 10-19 4.95 x 10-19 2.85 x 10-22 4.95 x 10-22 Lime Dark blue 611 nm 3.25 x 10-19 3.25 x 10-22