Page 1 of 1
In a previous poll 28% of adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together seven
Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 7:12 pm
by answerhappygod
- In A Previous Poll 28 Of Adults With Children Under The Age Of 18 Reported That Their Family Ate Dinner Together Seven 1 (32.49 KiB) Viewed 27 times
- In A Previous Poll 28 Of Adults With Children Under The Age Of 18 Reported That Their Family Ate Dinner Together Seven 2 (17.35 KiB) Viewed 27 times
In a previous poll 28% of adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together seven nights a work Suppose that in a more recent pol 285 of 1090 adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together seven nights a week. Is there sufficient evidence that the proportion of fames with children under the age of 18 who eat dinner together seven nights a week has decreased? Use the 001 significance level Because npo (1-P) 10 and the samples.ce is 5% of the population size, and the sample w the requirements for testing the hypothesis sasted (Round to one decimal place as needed What are the null and alternative hypotheses? Ho versus (Typo integers or decimals. Do not round) Find the test statistico You (Round to two decimal places as needed) Find the value P.Value = El Round to three decimal places as ceeded) Is there suficient evidence that the proportion of families with children under the age of 18 who cal dinner together seven nights a week has decreased? Choose the correct answer below OA No, there is not sufficient evidence because the P value is greater than the level of significance Thecoforo, rojot the null hypothesis OB. Yes, there is sufficient evidence because the P value is greater than the level of significance Therefore reject the null hypothesis Next
Is there suflicient evidence that the proportion of families with children under the age of 18 who eat dinner together seven nights a week has decreased? Choose the correct answer below OA No, there is not sufficient evidence because the P value is greater than the level of significance Therefore, roject tho nul hypothesis OB. Yes, there is sufficient evidence because the value is greater than the level of significance. Therefore,roject the nul hypothesis: OC. Yes, there is sufficient evidence because the P value is greater than the level of significance Therefore, do not reject the ruli hiypothesis OD. No there is not sucient evidence because the P. value in greater than the level of significance Therolou, do not reject the run hypothesis Next Statcrunch