Page 1 of 1

Question 4 SH in a previous poil 35% of adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner t

Posted: Wed May 11, 2022 2:23 pm
by answerhappygod
Question 4 Sh In A Previous Poil 35 Of Adults With Children Under The Age Of 18 Reported That Their Family Ate Dinner T 1
Question 4 Sh In A Previous Poil 35 Of Adults With Children Under The Age Of 18 Reported That Their Family Ate Dinner T 1 (27.16 KiB) Viewed 28 times
Question 4 Sh In A Previous Poil 35 Of Adults With Children Under The Age Of 18 Reported That Their Family Ate Dinner T 2
Question 4 Sh In A Previous Poil 35 Of Adults With Children Under The Age Of 18 Reported That Their Family Ate Dinner T 2 (35.75 KiB) Viewed 28 times
Question 4 SH in a previous poil 35% of adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together seven nights week Suppose that in a more recent poll. 367 of 1100 adults with children under the age of 18 reported that their family ate dinner together seven nights a week. Is there sufficient evidence that the proportion of fames with children under the age of 18 who eat dinner together seven nights a week has decreased the the a = 0,05 significance level What is the null hypothesis Ho P>0.35 P 0.35 P<0.35 P=0.35 Enter A, B, C or D IL What is the alternative hypothesis H 2 P >0.35 P0.35 P<0.35 P=0.35 Enter A, B, C. or D Calculate the test statistic 20 (Round to two decimal places)

P025 Enter AB COD What the Sitemative hypothesis H P > 0.35 P 0.35 P<0.35 P=0.35 Enter A acord dllCalculate the test statistic. (Round to two decimal places) IV. Calculate the P value (Round to three decimal places) V is there sufficient evidence that the proportion of families with children under the 3ge of 18 who eat dinner together seven nights a week has decreased? Choose the correct conclusion below A Yes, there is sufficient evidence because the P value is greater than the level of significance: Hence, reject the nullhypothesis B. No, there not sufficient evidence because the P-value is greater than the level of significance. Hence, do not reject the null hypothesis. Ć yes, there is sufficient evidence since the P value is greater than the level of significance. Therefore, do no reject the null hypothesis D. No, there is not sufficient evidence since the P value is greater than the level of significance. Therefore, reject the null typothesis Enter A.B.C. or D • Previous new data to ye ist checked at 6:08pm Submit Quiz