A report released by a region's bureau of labor statistics found the average annual household spending on food at home i

[answerhappygod]

A Report Released By A Region S Bureau Of Labor Statistics Found The Average Annual Household Spending On Food At Home I 1 (40.1 KiB) Viewed 22 times

A Report Released By A Region S Bureau Of Labor Statistics Found The Average Annual Household Spending On Food At Home I 2 (77.53 KiB) Viewed 22 times

A Report Released By A Region S Bureau Of Labor Statistics Found The Average Annual Household Spending On Food At Home I 3 (81.93 KiB) Viewed 22 times

A Report Released By A Region S Bureau Of Labor Statistics Found The Average Annual Household Spending On Food At Home I 4 (39.21 KiB) Viewed 22 times

A report released by a region's bureau of labor statistics found the average annual household spending on food at home in 2014 was $3,838. Suppose a random sample of 137 households in a certain city was taken to determine whether the average annual expenditure on food at home was less for consumer units in the city a than in the region as a whole. The sample results are shown in the accompanying table. Based on the sample results, can it be concluded at the a= 0.02 level of significance that average consumer-unit spending for food at home in the city is less than the regional average? e Click the icon to view the data table. se State the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses. Choose the correct answer below. OA Ho 23,838 H <3,838 OD. Ho =3,838 HA3,838 OB. Ho3,838 HA 53,838 OE. HO 3,838 HA3,838 OC, HH < 3,838 HA 23,838 OF H 53,838 HA >3,838 k ha Calculate the test statistic (Round to two decimal places as needed) Find the p-value D-value - (Round to three decimal places as needed) State the conclusion Choose the correct answer below. O A Do not reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at significance level ao 02 to suggest that the mean annual household spending on food at home in the city is less than $3,838 OB. Reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence at significance lovel a 0.02 to suggest that the mean annual household spending on food at home in the city is greater than $3.838 OC Reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence at significance level or=0.02 to suggest that the mean annual household spending on food at home in na

Х Annual household spending on food at home 3,461.94 3,111.29 3,128.93 2,827.88 3,112.97 3,501.45 3,411.88 3,473.01 3,336.98 3,736.22 2,730.35 3,621.57 3,593.44 3,114.94 3,211.59 2,752.42 3,445.67 3,221.95 3,304.11 3,179.14 3,566.24 3,098.08 2.779.19 3,014.89 3,376.55 3,106.43 3,428.73 2,796.52 3,105.29 3,568.13 3,419.27 3,700.97 3,751.26 2,904.85 3,510.72 3,358.68 3,705.27 3,390.98 3,159.41 3,440.58 2,996.21 3,939.72 3,501.14 3,271.21 2,848.88 3,274.22 3,068.33 3,370.12 3,622.73 3,364.69 3,112.65 3,770.28 3,314.12 2,777.14 3,292.74 3,265.55 3,125.99 3,895.22

3,307.03 3,440.26 3,042.99 3,397.66 3,132.85 3,248.99 3,166.41 2,912.39 3,500.15 3,151.93 3,116.98 3,567.99 2,831.36 2,837.65 3,027.83 3,161.25 3,307.01 3,057.34 3,762.75 3,277.96 3,142.87 3,403.86 3,618.51 3,239.47 3,071.48 2,926.41 2,903.82 3,154.58 3,286.27 3,449.08 3,522.42 3,045.12 3,065.09 3,189.72 3,651.41 3,356.74 3,404.55 3,114.55 3,396.79 3,599.82 3,274.62 2,946.82 3,475.58 3,508.51 3,018.99 2,822.24 2,951.68 3,635.81 3,528.28 3,417.99 3,308.34 3,445.37 2,957.28 3,134.34 3,589.81 3,332.98 3,552.96 3,001.93 E ual

3,265.33 3,006.58 3,378.26 3,372.13 3,701.05 3,041.13 3,178.24 2,881.34 3,334.48 3,124.45 3,207.75 3,670.39 3,271.93 2,789.08 3,150.33 3,142.03 3,289.51 3,480.03 3,327.25 3,279.44 3,234.94