Answer Happy

Is the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south lower than the proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west? 357 of the 570 randomly selected wildfires looked at in the south were caused by humans while 376 of the 575 randomly selected wildfires looked at the west were caused by humans. What can be concluded at the a = 0.10 level of significance? a. For this study, we should use Select an answer b. The null and alternative hypotheses would be: Select an answer Select an answer (please enter a Ho: Select an answer decimal) H1: Select an answer decimal) Select an answer v Select an answer (Please enter a II C. The test statistic ? (please show your answer to 3 decimal places.) d. The p-value = (Please show your answer to 4 decimal places.) e. The p-value is ? va f. Based on this, we should Select an answer the null hypothesis. g. Thus, the final conclusion is that ... The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is statistically significant evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is equal to the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is lower than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically significant at a = 0.10, so there is sufficient evidence to conclude that the proportion of the 570 wildfires that were caused by humans in the south is lower than the proportion of the 575 wildfires that were caused by humans in the west. The results are statistically insignificant at a = 0.10, so there is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the south is lower than the population proportion of wildfires caused by humans in the west.