Answer Happy

Posted: **Wed May 11, 2022 8:57 am**

: Workengag Leadership Performance 32 32 2 830969 19 79 5 32642 16 44 3 068711 99 81 15 8347 41 78 0 53622 100 57 2 7056 1 (30.98 KiB) Viewed 35 times

: Workengag Leadership Performance 32 32 2 830969 19 79 5 32642 16 44 3 068711 99 81 15 8347 41 78 0 53622 100 57 2 7056 2 (25.97 KiB) Viewed 35 times

: Workengag Leadership Performance 32 32 2 830969 19 79 5 32642 16 44 3 068711 99 81 15 8347 41 78 0 53622 100 57 2 7056 3 (40.87 KiB) Viewed 35 times

WorkEngag Leadership Performance 32 32 2.830969 19 79 -5.32642 16 44 3.068711 99 81 15.8347 41 78 -0.53622 100 57 2.705603 32 90 -3.48633 86 33 -8.59147 9 75 -7.12482 79 50 -1.13736 59 49 -0.51612 31 17 4.874721 87 30 -9.47398 21 86 -7.19154 47 83 1.898472 24 2 10.58539 96 55 0.918524 14 74 -6.03288 69 46 -1.73566 55 92 4.758032 13 16 11.64036 41 58 0.4559 20 85 -7.04154 56 37 -1.48224 41 84 0.183811 19 22 7.815775 41 26 1.590311 45 33 0.52242 4 23 12.47156 11 67 -4.11119

What is the value of the unstandardized beta (B1) associated with work engagement? Please round to two decimal places. Question 2 5 pts What is the t-statistic associated with work engagement? Please round to two decimal places.

Was the effect of work engagement statistically significant? O A. Yes. It was statistically significant because the p-value was less than .05. O B. Yes. It was statistically significant because the p-value was greater than .05. O C. No. It was not statistically significant because the p-value was less than .05. O D. No. It was not statistically significant because the p-value was greater than 05. Question 4 5 pts What is the value of the unstandardized beta (B2) associated with leadership satisfaction? Please round to two decimal places.