Answer Happy

VOLVO Ostion 4 In 2005 the population in index the more in Highly taciti sportowe Wher the sing ndeson changel in the researcher blot the following data from a random sample of 10 highly red cercare facilities Ath the population des mal distributed and that the pandard devices 000 At the level of these sufficient evidence to conclude of the man Index is diferent from 1. sept ce potniwer the following us Some the null and masive hypothesis in the cluymbols by Identify the level of significance a c) Obtain the test (s) and the value d) Al the given level of significance, do we reject or do not reject thellypothesis (2) e) State your conclusion in the context of the problem. (2 psi
Question + In 2005, the population meaning index the munie-o-putut ratio) in italy rated cance facilities was omnes per cancer patient to investigate whether the mining index has changed nisce then, researcher edhe following data from and sample of 10 lyned cancer care facilities. Asume the population distributin omally distributed and that the populi standard deviation is 0.40 All the 10% level of significance, is thereficienteve to conclude that the main index is different from 16 nurses per cancer power the following questions a) State the mall and alternative hypothesis using mathematical symbol bi Identity the level of significance a c) Obtain the test turistic 2-t) and the Peale per d) At the given level of significance do we reject or do not reject the mill hypothesis pes State your conclusion in the context of the problem. (2)
FOR MORE PO Osesti fe 2001, the mean penting intereses patient ratio) in heyder eerste permetent Tuinige whether the wrong des besturend ince then choose of cancer Carees en dat de devi 040 At the 10% level of significant evidence the conciering Index is different from 1.6 unes per cancer patience fois que Scute the mail and alumnative troppothesis wing mathematical vymbols (2 pus) b) Identify the level of significance up c) Obtain the test statistic (stat) and the Palopes) d) At the given level of significance, do we reject or do not reject the null hypothesis (2 pts) e State your conclusion in the context of the problem. (2pcs)
Question 4 In 2005, the population meaning index (the netopiration highly med cancer facilities was 16 per cancer patient. To investigate whether the nursing inden handung then, a researcher and the following data from a random sample of 10 highly cancer care facilities. Assume that the population distribution is normally distributed and that the population standard deviation is 0:40 At the 10% level of significance, is there sufficient evidence to conclude that the meaning index is different from 16 unes per cancer patientswer the following questions A) Su the mill and emotivelypothesis wing mathematical symbols (2) b) Mentify the level of significance ( c) Obain the test statistic (2-) and the value (8) d) At the given level of significa do weter do not reject the bypothesis (270) ) State your conclusion in the context of the problem.pe