Question: In a psychosocial intervention project in a university, training was carried out to increase the levels of sel
Posted: Wed May 04, 2022 12:59 pm
Question: In a psychosocial intervention project in a
university, training was carried out to increase the levels of
self-efficacy of a group of students (n=40). Using an academic
self-efficacy scale, the level of self-efficacy before and after
training was evaluated. We want to know if there are statistically
significant differences in the mean of self-efficacy at the
beginning and after training.
1. Statistical analysis:
- T-test of repeated measures
2. Possible research question:
3. Develop the hypotheses:
H0 =
H1 =
4. Conclusion:
5. Report results appropriately in APA style.
Statistic Kolmogorov-Smirnova df Pre Test .112 40 .200* Post Test .122 40 .133 * This is a lower bound of the true significance a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Pair 1 Pre Test Post Test Pair 1 Pre_Test-Post_Test Tests of Normality Sig. Outputs Mean Std. Deviation 7.753 10.174 Statistic .952 .959 Paired Samples Statistics Mean N Std. Deviation 46.28 40 8.612 38.52 40 4.276 Paired Samples Test Paired Differences Std. Error Mean Shapiro-Wilk df 40 40 1.609 4.499 Sig 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper t (obtenida) .086 .152 Std. Error Mean 1.362 .676 Significancia mayor de .05 (p > .05) Datos descriptivos Diferencia significativa (p<.05) Significance df One-Sided p Two-Sided p 39 <.001 <.001 Grados de libertad 11.007 4.820 T
university, training was carried out to increase the levels of
self-efficacy of a group of students (n=40). Using an academic
self-efficacy scale, the level of self-efficacy before and after
training was evaluated. We want to know if there are statistically
significant differences in the mean of self-efficacy at the
beginning and after training.
- Question In A Psychosocial Intervention Project In A University Training Was Carried Out To Increase The Levels Of Sel 1 (72.5 KiB) Viewed 42 times
- T-test of repeated measures
2. Possible research question:
3. Develop the hypotheses:
H0 =
H1 =
4. Conclusion:
5. Report results appropriately in APA style.
Statistic Kolmogorov-Smirnova df Pre Test .112 40 .200* Post Test .122 40 .133 * This is a lower bound of the true significance a. Lilliefors Significance Correction Pair 1 Pre Test Post Test Pair 1 Pre_Test-Post_Test Tests of Normality Sig. Outputs Mean Std. Deviation 7.753 10.174 Statistic .952 .959 Paired Samples Statistics Mean N Std. Deviation 46.28 40 8.612 38.52 40 4.276 Paired Samples Test Paired Differences Std. Error Mean Shapiro-Wilk df 40 40 1.609 4.499 Sig 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference Lower Upper t (obtenida) .086 .152 Std. Error Mean 1.362 .676 Significancia mayor de .05 (p > .05) Datos descriptivos Diferencia significativa (p<.05) Significance df One-Sided p Two-Sided p 39 <.001 <.001 Grados de libertad 11.007 4.820 T