B. CASELAW February 1989 U.S. Supreme Court Decision The highest court in the land ruled that public officials may not b

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899559
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

B. CASELAW February 1989 U.S. Supreme Court Decision The highest court in the land ruled that public officials may not b

Post by answerhappygod »

B Caselaw February 1989 U S Supreme Court Decision The Highest Court In The Land Ruled That Public Officials May Not B 1
B Caselaw February 1989 U S Supreme Court Decision The Highest Court In The Land Ruled That Public Officials May Not B 1 (58.43 KiB) Viewed 35 times
B. CASELAW February 1989 U.S. Supreme Court Decision The highest court in the land ruled that public officials may not be sued when their alleged gross negligence permits a child to be abused by a parent By a six to three vote, the justices said that a state does not have a constitutional duty to protect people, even abused children, who are not in the state's custody. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, writing for the court, said, "As a general matter... we conclude that a state's failure to protect an individual against private violence simply does not constitute a violation of the Constitution's) due process clause." (DeShaney v.Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989) No. 87-154) Discuss this ruling 1. If the gross negligence of a public official results in violence, should the public official be held legally responsible? Why or why not? 2. What, if any, repercussions would be appropriate?
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply