Based on this module's concepts and the context of climate change and sea-level rise, how could a person reasonably just

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899604
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

Based on this module's concepts and the context of climate change and sea-level rise, how could a person reasonably just

Post by answerhappygod »

Based on this module's concepts and the context of climate
change and sea-level rise, how could a person reasonably justify a
ban on buying properties with high-risk of
flooding?
Utilitarians would justify the banning of buying
high-risk properties because mostly poor people buy them.
Thus, buying these properties redistributes money from the
poor, who have high marginal utilities of money, to the rich, who
have lower marginal utilities of money.
All of the other answers are true.
c.
d
Rawlsians would justify the banning of buying
high-risk properties because mostly poor people will buy
them. Thus, buying these properties redistributes money from
the poor to the rich, making society’s least advantaged group even
worse off.
.
Nozickians would justify the banning of buying
high-risk properties if it could be proved that real
state brokers manipulate the sales and mislead buyers about
their odds of flooding in these properties.
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply