1. 1. For parametrised curves C : (x(t), y(t)), a 0} we define their hyperbolic le

Business, Finance, Economics, Accounting, Operations Management, Computer Science, Electrical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil Engineering, Chemical Engineering, Algebra, Precalculus, Statistics and Probabilty, Advanced Math, Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Nursing, Psychology, Certifications, Tests, Prep, and more.
Post Reply
answerhappygod
Site Admin
Posts: 899559
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am

1. 1. For parametrised curves C : (x(t), y(t)), a 0} we define their hyperbolic le

Post by answerhappygod »

1 1 For Parametrised Curves C X T Y T A T B With Image In H X Y R2 0 We Define Their Hyperbolic Le 1
1 1 For Parametrised Curves C X T Y T A T B With Image In H X Y R2 0 We Define Their Hyperbolic Le 1 (92.1 KiB) Viewed 43 times
1. 1. For parametrised curves C : (x(t), y(t)), a <t < b with image in H = {(x,y) R2: > 0} we define their hyperbolic length by Vi(1)2 + ()? Lhyp (C) = dt X(t) a) Lyp (C) is not changed by regular reparametrisation, meaning that Lhyp(C) = Lup(©) if C is parametrised by by (x(t(s)), y(t(s))) where t(s) is a one-variable func- tion satisfying either t(e) = a, t(d) = b, t'(s) > 0 (orientation preserving) or t(C) = b, (d) = a, t'(8) < 0 (orientation reversing). (3p) b) Express Lhyp (C) as an integral I = F(x, y, y') dx for curves C parame trised as graphs of the form (x, y(x)), SuSx2. (2p) c) Derive the Euler equation for the integral I from (b). (3p) d) Solve the Euler equation. (4p) e) Show that every solution parametrises a subset of either a half circle of the form {.? + (y -b)2 = R',>0} or of a half line {r > 0, y =b}. (3p) f) Show that the half lines and half circles in (e) have infinite length. (3p) g) Show that there are infinitely many half circles as in (e) avoiding the half line {r > 0, y =b}. A good way to do so is to describe this family in terms of centers and radii. (2p) Remark: If one views those half lines and half circles as the lines of a geometry on H, one can show that all axioms of euclidean geometry are valid except for the following axiom of parallels: For a line l and a point P in its complement, there is a unique line lp through P and disjoint from l. Historically, this discovery, due independently to Bolyai and Lobachevsky, was very influential. For a while, it had been unknown whether the axiom of parallels is a consequence of the other axioms. Finding the above alternative geometry showed its independence. (in total 20p)
Join a community of subject matter experts. Register for FREE to view solutions, replies, and use search function. Request answer by replying!
Post Reply