solutions. These alternatives provide all the required functionality users demand with a system that is minimally different from the current system. These alternatives go beyond simply solving the problem in question and focus instead on systems that contain many extra features users may desire. These alternatives are the most conservative in terms of the effort, cost, and technology involved in developing a new system. 2. mid-range alternatives > 3. low-end alternatives
Match each of the following alternatives with its corresponding description. (Answers may occur more than once.) Functionality, not cost, is the primary focus of these alternatives. 1. high-end alternatives 2. mid-range alternatives These alternatives represent compromise solutions. These alternatives provide all the required functionality users demand with a system that is а minimally different from the current system. These alternatives go beyond simply solving the problem in question and focus instead on systems that contain many extra features users may desire. These alternatives are the most conservative in terms of the effort, cost, and technology involved in developing a new system. 3. low-end alternatives
Match each of the following alternatives with its corresponding description. (Answers may occur more than once.) 1. high-end alternatives Functionality, not cost, is the primary focus of these alternatives. These alternatives represent compromise Match each of the following alternatives with its corresponding description. (Answers may occur more than once.) 1. high
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 899603
- Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2021 8:13 am