For an assembly line shown in table 10-6, the line efficiency is O A. 64% OB. 74% O c. 80% w OD. 84% O E None of the abo

[answerhappygod]

For An Assembly Line Shown In Table 10 6 The Line Efficiency Is O A 64 Ob 74 O C 80 W Od 84 O E None Of The Abo 1 (40.47 KiB) Viewed 28 times

For An Assembly Line Shown In Table 10 6 The Line Efficiency Is O A 64 Ob 74 O C 80 W Od 84 O E None Of The Abo 2 (36.65 KiB) Viewed 28 times

For an assembly line shown in table 10-6, the line efficiency is O A. 64% OB. 74% O c. 80% w OD. 84% O E None of the above.

CHAPTER 16 TIME STANDARD Table 10-6 Initial Assembly Line Balance. NUMBER ROUNDED AVERAGE PERCENT STATIONS OFF TIME LOADED HOURS PER UNIT PECE PE TASK 92 87 78 71 SSSA SSAT SSAZ SAT A1 AZ А3 SAZ 5A3 PO Total 306 291 260 356 310 555 250 415 250 501 3.494 1.77 1.68 1.50 2.06 1.79 3.20 144 2.40 1.44 2.90 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 3 2 3 25 153 145 130 119 155 139 725 138 125 .167 (58,88門858 00557 00557 00557 00834 00557 01112 00557 00834 00557 00834 06950 15 150 120 180 90 180 123 83 75 83 75 100 150 120 .00557 00417 .00140 500.000 700 @S 15.00 = $10.500.00 balanced cost by itself cost savings hours/unit units/year hours per year per hour per year savings This is called the cost of balancing. In this case it is too high. Subassemblies that can be taken off the line must be 1. Poorly loaded. The less percent loaded, the more desirable to be subassembled. Forca ple, a 60 load on the assembly line balance would indicate 405 lost time. If we take the job off the assembly line (not tied to the other operators), we could save 40 of the 2. Small parts easily stacked and stored. 3. Easily moved. The cost of transportation and the inventory cost will go that because of better labor utilization, total cost must go down A subassembly on the assembly line balance form